Guides Auto vs Manual

Automated Testing vs Manual Audit: Coverage, Costs, and Reliability

Automated vs Manual: Two Complementary Approaches

Both are essential but with very different roles and limits.

Automated: 30-40% Coverage

Detects: missing alt, contrast issues, missing labels, page language, heading hierarchy, incorrect ARIA syntax, empty links/buttons.

Manual Only: 60-70% Remaining

Alt text relevance, navigation logic, screen reader usability, content meaning without visuals, keyboard trap detection, alternative equivalence.

Comparison

Automated: free, minutes, every deployment, low expertise. Manual: €3-15K, 5-15 days, 1-2x/year, expert required. Automated has many false negatives; manual is comprehensive.

Recommended Strategy

CI/CD automated tests continuously, RGAA Test + keyboard each sprint, screen reader quarterly, full manual audit annually, user reporting permanently.

Automated testing is your daily safety net. Manual audit is your annual health check. Both are necessary.
No. Automated tools cover only 30-40% of RGAA criteria. Expert manual audit is essential for the remaining 60-70%.
A complete RGAA audit by an expert costs €3,000-15,000 depending on site complexity. For a simple 15-page site, expect €3,000-5,000.
Automated tests at each deployment, quick manual checks each sprint, full audit at least yearly or after major redesign.

Test your site's compliance

Scan your site and get a detailed report with AI recommendations.

Scan my site - €15